sareesh
10-29 01:19 PM
Eb3
Thanks Chiwere.
Can I refile under EB2?
Thanks Chiwere.
Can I refile under EB2?
wallpaper War Of The Worlds 2005
Blog Feeds
05-16 07:40 AM
Opponents of comprehensive immigration reform often point to the 1986 legalization bill as a great failure that should not be repeated. What they don't want to talk about are the great number of success stories for people who were able to become legal. One story that is making the news 25 years later is that of Ana Hernandez Luna who gave an extraordinary speech on the floor of the Texas House of Representatives where she told her own story of her life as a young undocumented immigrant in the 1980s. The Texas Observer reported on her remarks: Tuesday, after it...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/05/immigrant-of-the-day-ana-hernandez-luna-legislator.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/05/immigrant-of-the-day-ana-hernandez-luna-legislator.html)
ilikekilo
04-12 01:53 PM
I had started my anual subscribtion this Friday (4/10/09). How long does it take to be admitted into the donors forum? I have sent the email with details that same day itself. I have not yet recieved a reciept or any RFEs. Hope there is no backlog:D:D:D
I think it takes a few days to confirm the sub....thnks
I think it takes a few days to confirm the sub....thnks
2011 2005#39;s hg wells war of the
![war of the worlds movie pictures. 2010 [Movie]War of the Worlds](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_vM2dQXg5UUenF41cABjjy0g1JU_fx86MtFfRAtqfysZcYJl6DwEz3IBX_B7CnxaxoapNk6WuTXhBuUDsJWfaNTkcc4y5cViTFuUNhvse6yI3RfclISvp9t5ofoO-lrhZeZBJihAsajoPhKUfAZ1Ze_1deQyp2MEillrw=s0-d "2010 [Movie]War of the Worlds")
danalvidrez
04-05 02:40 AM
Here are a few ideas...
http://www.danalvidrez.com/_kirupa/stamps/jerry.jpg
http://www.danalvidrez.com/_kirupa/stamps/pills.jpg
http://www.danalvidrez.com/_kirupa/stamps/infin.jpg
http://www.danalvidrez.com/_kirupa/stamps/griffin.jpg
http://www.danalvidrez.com/_kirupa/stamps/jerry.jpg
http://www.danalvidrez.com/_kirupa/stamps/pills.jpg
http://www.danalvidrez.com/_kirupa/stamps/infin.jpg
http://www.danalvidrez.com/_kirupa/stamps/griffin.jpg
more...
pmat
01-24 12:15 PM
The category (EB2/EB3) doesn't get transferred. Only the PD can be transferred. So, you will get the old PD for EB3.
Saikrishna
08-15 03:51 PM
GUYS - PLEASE SAY YES TO RALLY AND TRY TO ATTEND
IV CORE TEAM HAVE ALREADY COMPLAINT THAT WE DONT HAVE MUCH PEOPLE TO SUPPORT THIS RALLY AS WELL.
FORGET ABOUT YOUR RECIEPT NOTICE NOW AND CONCENRATE ON THESE RALLY WHICH WILL GIVE US ULTIMATE BENEFIT TO GIVE US GREEN CARD.
OTHERWISE BE A BIG LOSER SEARCHING FOR YOUR RECIEPT NOTICE STATUS OR AP OR EAD STATUS.
aTTEND RALLY , BE POSTIVE AND ACHIEVE END-GOAL OF GETTING GREEN CARD BEFORE NEXT YEAR 2008.
AWAKE AWAKE UNTIL YOU REACH THE GOAL - SWAMI VIVEKANANDA
SUPPORT THE IV CORE TEAM RALLY AT WASHINGTON DC ON 18 SEPT:)
IV CORE TEAM HAVE ALREADY COMPLAINT THAT WE DONT HAVE MUCH PEOPLE TO SUPPORT THIS RALLY AS WELL.
FORGET ABOUT YOUR RECIEPT NOTICE NOW AND CONCENRATE ON THESE RALLY WHICH WILL GIVE US ULTIMATE BENEFIT TO GIVE US GREEN CARD.
OTHERWISE BE A BIG LOSER SEARCHING FOR YOUR RECIEPT NOTICE STATUS OR AP OR EAD STATUS.
aTTEND RALLY , BE POSTIVE AND ACHIEVE END-GOAL OF GETTING GREEN CARD BEFORE NEXT YEAR 2008.
AWAKE AWAKE UNTIL YOU REACH THE GOAL - SWAMI VIVEKANANDA
SUPPORT THE IV CORE TEAM RALLY AT WASHINGTON DC ON 18 SEPT:)
more...
Macaca
09-27 11:40 AM
Following Bush Over a Cliff (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/26/AR2007092602067.html) By David S. Broder (davidbroder@washpost.com) | Washington Post, September 27, 2007
The spectacle Tuesday of 151 House Republicans voting in lock step with the White House against expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) was one of the more remarkable sights of the year. Rarely do you see so many politicians putting their careers in jeopardy.
The bill they opposed, at the urging of President Bush, commands healthy majorities in both the House and Senate but is headed for a veto because Bush objects to expanding this form of safety net for the children of the working poor. He has staked out that ground on his own, ignoring or rejecting the pleas of conservative senators such as Chuck Grassley and Orrin Hatch, who helped shape the compromise that the House approved and that the Senate endorsed.
SCHIP has been one of the most successful health-care measures created in the past decade. It was started in 1997 with support from both parties, in order to insure children in families with incomes too high to receive Medicaid but who could not afford private insurance.
The $40 billion spent on SCHIP in the past 10 years financed insurance for roughly 6.6 million youngsters a year. The money was distributed through the states, which were given considerable flexibility in designing their programs. The insurance came from private companies, at rates negotiated by the states.
Governors of both parties -- 43 of them, again including conservatives such as Sonny Perdue of Georgia -- have praised the program. And they endorsed the congressional decision to expand the coverage to an additional 4 million youngsters, at the cost of an additional $35 billion over the next five years. The bill would be financed by a 61-cents-a-pack increase in cigarette taxes. If ever there was a crowd-pleaser of a bill, this is it. Hundreds of organizations -- grass-roots groups ranging from AARP to United Way of America and the national YMCA -- have called on Bush to sign the bill. America's Health Insurance Plans, the largest insurance lobbying group, endorsed the bill on Monday.
But Bush insists that SCHIP is "an incremental step toward the goal of government-run health care for every American" -- an eventuality he is determined to prevent.
Bush's adamant stand may be peculiar to him, but the willingness of Republican legislators to line up with him is more significant. Bush does not have to face the voters again, but these men and women will be on the ballot in just over a year -- and their Democratic opponents will undoubtedly remind them of their votes.
Two of their smartest colleagues -- Heather Wilson of New Mexico and Ray LaHood of Illinois -- tried to steer House Republicans away from this political self-immolation, but they had minimal success. The combined influence of White House and congressional leadership -- and what I would have to call herd instinct -- prevailed.
Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Tex.) argued that "rather than taking the opportunity to cover the children that cannot obtain coverage through Medicaid or the private marketplace, this bill uses these children as pawns in their cynical attempt to make millions of Americans completely reliant upon the government for their health-care needs."
In his new book, former Federal Reserve Board chairman Alan Greenspan wrote that his fellow Republicans deserved to lose their congressional majority in 2006 because they let spending run out of control and turned a blind eye toward misbehavior by their own members. Now, those Republicans have given voters a fresh reason to question their priorities -- or their common sense.
Saying no to immigration reform and measures to shorten the war in Iraq may be politically defensible, because there are substantial constituencies who question the wisdom of those bills -- and who favor alternative policies. But the Bush administration's arguments against SCHIP -- the cost of the program and the financing -- sound hollow at a time when billions more are being spent in Iraq with no end in sight. Bush's alternative -- a change in the tax treatment of employer-financed health insurance -- has some real appeal, but it is an idea he let languish for months after offering it last winter. And, in the judgment of his fellow Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee, Bush's plan is too complex and controversial to be tied to the renewal of SCHIP.
This promised veto is a real poison pill for the GOP.
The spectacle Tuesday of 151 House Republicans voting in lock step with the White House against expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) was one of the more remarkable sights of the year. Rarely do you see so many politicians putting their careers in jeopardy.
The bill they opposed, at the urging of President Bush, commands healthy majorities in both the House and Senate but is headed for a veto because Bush objects to expanding this form of safety net for the children of the working poor. He has staked out that ground on his own, ignoring or rejecting the pleas of conservative senators such as Chuck Grassley and Orrin Hatch, who helped shape the compromise that the House approved and that the Senate endorsed.
SCHIP has been one of the most successful health-care measures created in the past decade. It was started in 1997 with support from both parties, in order to insure children in families with incomes too high to receive Medicaid but who could not afford private insurance.
The $40 billion spent on SCHIP in the past 10 years financed insurance for roughly 6.6 million youngsters a year. The money was distributed through the states, which were given considerable flexibility in designing their programs. The insurance came from private companies, at rates negotiated by the states.
Governors of both parties -- 43 of them, again including conservatives such as Sonny Perdue of Georgia -- have praised the program. And they endorsed the congressional decision to expand the coverage to an additional 4 million youngsters, at the cost of an additional $35 billion over the next five years. The bill would be financed by a 61-cents-a-pack increase in cigarette taxes. If ever there was a crowd-pleaser of a bill, this is it. Hundreds of organizations -- grass-roots groups ranging from AARP to United Way of America and the national YMCA -- have called on Bush to sign the bill. America's Health Insurance Plans, the largest insurance lobbying group, endorsed the bill on Monday.
But Bush insists that SCHIP is "an incremental step toward the goal of government-run health care for every American" -- an eventuality he is determined to prevent.
Bush's adamant stand may be peculiar to him, but the willingness of Republican legislators to line up with him is more significant. Bush does not have to face the voters again, but these men and women will be on the ballot in just over a year -- and their Democratic opponents will undoubtedly remind them of their votes.
Two of their smartest colleagues -- Heather Wilson of New Mexico and Ray LaHood of Illinois -- tried to steer House Republicans away from this political self-immolation, but they had minimal success. The combined influence of White House and congressional leadership -- and what I would have to call herd instinct -- prevailed.
Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Tex.) argued that "rather than taking the opportunity to cover the children that cannot obtain coverage through Medicaid or the private marketplace, this bill uses these children as pawns in their cynical attempt to make millions of Americans completely reliant upon the government for their health-care needs."
In his new book, former Federal Reserve Board chairman Alan Greenspan wrote that his fellow Republicans deserved to lose their congressional majority in 2006 because they let spending run out of control and turned a blind eye toward misbehavior by their own members. Now, those Republicans have given voters a fresh reason to question their priorities -- or their common sense.
Saying no to immigration reform and measures to shorten the war in Iraq may be politically defensible, because there are substantial constituencies who question the wisdom of those bills -- and who favor alternative policies. But the Bush administration's arguments against SCHIP -- the cost of the program and the financing -- sound hollow at a time when billions more are being spent in Iraq with no end in sight. Bush's alternative -- a change in the tax treatment of employer-financed health insurance -- has some real appeal, but it is an idea he let languish for months after offering it last winter. And, in the judgment of his fellow Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee, Bush's plan is too complex and controversial to be tied to the renewal of SCHIP.
This promised veto is a real poison pill for the GOP.
2010 war of the worlds 2005.
kaisersose
07-17 05:25 PM
This incident opened my eyes and prodded me to move my fat ass to do something about this.
I just made my first contribution of $100 to IV.
Gandhi once said "Make your contribution, however insignificant you think it is. In reality, your contribution makes a huge difference".
Like he said, our little acts when combined become a formidable act and can accomplish a lot. I would suggest others make contributions too - especially now when everyone is excited - before you get back to the usual reticent state. let us not try to ride piggyback on some else's efforts.
-----------
Contributed $100 to begin with...More in future.
I just made my first contribution of $100 to IV.
Gandhi once said "Make your contribution, however insignificant you think it is. In reality, your contribution makes a huge difference".
Like he said, our little acts when combined become a formidable act and can accomplish a lot. I would suggest others make contributions too - especially now when everyone is excited - before you get back to the usual reticent state. let us not try to ride piggyback on some else's efforts.
-----------
Contributed $100 to begin with...More in future.
more...
highaimer
01-23 07:54 PM
Hi All,
I am in EB3 with priority date of 2003 nov, I have a masters degree in US. Because of my negligence I applied in eb3. my i140 is cleared in eb3. waiting for priority date. Now I am planning to file eb2 perm and make us of the old priority date. Before joining for work I completed all the course work but didnt get the degree. I got the degree one year after I joined for work. My graduation date in the degree certificate is 5 months after my priority date. Will this raise red flags in the eb2 I-140 stage. Would it be safer for me to go for regular i-140 or premium processing. Any help or suggestion will be deeply appreciated.
Thanks in advance
I am in EB3 with priority date of 2003 nov, I have a masters degree in US. Because of my negligence I applied in eb3. my i140 is cleared in eb3. waiting for priority date. Now I am planning to file eb2 perm and make us of the old priority date. Before joining for work I completed all the course work but didnt get the degree. I got the degree one year after I joined for work. My graduation date in the degree certificate is 5 months after my priority date. Will this raise red flags in the eb2 I-140 stage. Would it be safer for me to go for regular i-140 or premium processing. Any help or suggestion will be deeply appreciated.
Thanks in advance
hair 2010 [Movie]War of the Worlds
Maria_Mathew
04-03 12:21 AM
Hi there,
What's the typical starting salary for a Software Developer (Java/SQL) in Massachusetts, USA with 18 months of Indian job experience? The job offer is from a small company (with ~150 employees and close to ~120 million revenue), but with great growth prospects.
-Maria
What's the typical starting salary for a Software Developer (Java/SQL) in Massachusetts, USA with 18 months of Indian job experience? The job offer is from a small company (with ~150 employees and close to ~120 million revenue), but with great growth prospects.
-Maria
more...
braindrain
11-13 02:16 PM
As long as the Master Program in UK is equivalent to Masters in US, you should be good.
You can get your credentials evaluated in US and see if its a Masters equivalent.
You can get your credentials evaluated in US and see if its a Masters equivalent.
hot War Of The Worlds Alien Blood
whoever
03-24 12:41 AM
how did you get h1 without quota?
more...
house When Worlds Collide / War of
SandeR2
03-24 09:26 AM
cool style you got there :) is it done in flash?
tattoo War of the Worlds-2005
segio
06-20 01:15 PM
When is name check started?
Immediately after 485 is received, or after the 1st FP?:confused:
Immediately after 485 is received, or after the 1st FP?:confused:
more...
pictures War of the Worlds Movie Poster
Blog Feeds
05-18 10:10 AM
One of my long-time paralegals at Siskind Susser, PC is Esther Schacther Fridman. Esther, who grew up here in Memphis, is the granddaughter of Holocaust survivors. In 2005, she married Benny Fridman, an Israeli who was on a work visa in Memphis at the time. The two moved to Israel shortly thereafter and Esther continues working with the firm on writing projects. Esther and Benny are the subject of a new documentary which premiered in Memphis last night. The union of Esther and Benny is unusual - their eight grandparents were all Holocaust survivors. I am friends with two of...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/05/a-testimony-to-survival.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/05/a-testimony-to-survival.html)
dresses War of the Worlds Wallpaper
ravi98
10-25 02:26 PM
Things that make it harder to push for immigration legislation - legal or illegal. New Figures Detail Depth Of Unemployment Misery, Lower Earnings For All But Super Wealthy (VIDEO) (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/25/income_inequality_statistics_tax_code__n_773392.ht ml)
more...
makeup war of the worlds 2005 poster.
chris
10-10 09:36 AM
Hi giveit,
The background is easy, find a picture that you like, add it to a layer temporarily, draw over the main areas ie doors walls windows etc then go back and fil in those areas with colour, then delete the layer with the pic on.
As for the man walking its a bit more complicated, I may be able to help out, Which direction is he walking ie Diagonally, vertically,
up, down etc.
Let me know and i'll see what I can do.
The background is easy, find a picture that you like, add it to a layer temporarily, draw over the main areas ie doors walls windows etc then go back and fil in those areas with colour, then delete the layer with the pic on.
As for the man walking its a bit more complicated, I may be able to help out, Which direction is he walking ie Diagonally, vertically,
up, down etc.
Let me know and i'll see what I can do.
girlfriend tattoo 2011 War of the Worlds
Seek_Gc
11-03 10:42 AM
No.
Thanks
Thanks
hairstyles girlfriend War of the Worlds
kvl_ingam
01-08 03:47 AM
Hi
My fiancee is currently on H1B (got through the 2008 quota) and I am currently on F1 visa status. She is planning to go on an F2 as my dependent.
Please clarify these doubts:
When she gets a job while she is on F2 and the new employer processes her H1B does she have to go through the whole process of H1B as a new visa issue (annual cap) or is it like an H1B transfer?
Once going from H1B to F2, is there a certain time period one has to wait before one can go back to H1B?
If the F2 application is pending, is it possible to reapply from F2 back to H1B during that period?
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Ingam
My fiancee is currently on H1B (got through the 2008 quota) and I am currently on F1 visa status. She is planning to go on an F2 as my dependent.
Please clarify these doubts:
When she gets a job while she is on F2 and the new employer processes her H1B does she have to go through the whole process of H1B as a new visa issue (annual cap) or is it like an H1B transfer?
Once going from H1B to F2, is there a certain time period one has to wait before one can go back to H1B?
If the F2 application is pending, is it possible to reapply from F2 back to H1B during that period?
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Ingam
Dipika
04-27 10:19 AM
I am EB3 - Dec 2004 filer and there is no hope for few years that my date get current. i have filed another GC through my sister in May 2006 and that F4 category is moving quicker and expecting my priority date will be current in 5 years through my sister.
i have bought 2 Family house in Jersey City. now for my kids education we thought to move to India for 4 to 5 years until we get call for GC though my sister.
we are going to rent house - it's multi family near NYC. my landloard is willing to take care of it in our absence.
my Q is can i get B1 (Visitor visa) for 10 years , if we show that we have property in US and we may need to visit just to take check it ??
should we inform immigration officer about GC filed though my sister to assure that we will not stay in US longer, to get B1 visa?
can we get visitor visa before leaving USA? i mean convert from H1 to B1 for multi year?
i have bought 2 Family house in Jersey City. now for my kids education we thought to move to India for 4 to 5 years until we get call for GC though my sister.
we are going to rent house - it's multi family near NYC. my landloard is willing to take care of it in our absence.
my Q is can i get B1 (Visitor visa) for 10 years , if we show that we have property in US and we may need to visit just to take check it ??
should we inform immigration officer about GC filed though my sister to assure that we will not stay in US longer, to get B1 visa?
can we get visitor visa before leaving USA? i mean convert from H1 to B1 for multi year?
atlgc
01-10 12:06 PM
thanks
so just send to NSC ,that's prettymuch to it?
Thanks
so just send to NSC ,that's prettymuch to it?
Thanks
No comments:
Post a Comment